AI brand mention tracking
A fixed prompt set per engine, checked monthly. Mentions, citations, sentiment, and who gets named instead of you — kept as raw answers you can read, not just a score.
AI visibility is the new rank tracking: which prompts mention you, which engines cite you, and who owns the answers you don't. Every RankCited account gets the tracking free — a monthly plan adds the team that moves the number.
AI visibility is how often, and how favorably, your brand appears in AI-generated answers across engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews — some teams call it LLM visibility. It is measured against a fixed set of prompts that matter to your business — the AI-era equivalent of tracking keyword rankings.
Plenty of tools will chart this number for you — and charge for it. We give the chart away: every account gets the full report free. The number only moves when the sources engines rely on start mentioning you, and that is placement work, not dashboard work. That is what a monthly plan buys: a team that does the placements and re-measures the result.
The fixing happens through our AI SEO services — GEO for citation share, AEO for specific questions.
A fixed prompt set per engine, checked monthly. Mentions, citations, sentiment, and who gets named instead of you — kept as raw answers you can read, not just a score.
Every citation traced to the page that earned it. You learn which coverage actually feeds answers — and which placements were wasted money.
The same tracking runs for the competitors you pick. When their share of voice jumps, you see the placement that caused it within the month.
Rank tracking watches your position on a results page. AI visibility watches whether generated answers mention or cite you at all. There is no position ten in an answer — you are in it or you are not — so the metric behaves differently and the work to move it does too.
Ones your buyers plausibly ask: category recommendations, comparisons against competitors, problem-solving questions your product answers. We draft the set from search data and your sales conversations; you approve it before tracking starts.
Monthly by default, because engines do not reshuffle sources much faster than that and higher frequency mostly measures noise. Clients running active placement campaigns can switch key prompts to weekly.
Yes — the report is free for every account, no card required. Some teams run a quarter of pure measurement to build the internal case. Fair warning though: the report usually makes the placement gap obvious, because you see exactly which sources cite competitors and not you.
Yes. A mention that calls you expensive-but-dated is not a win. Each tracked answer records how you are characterized, so the monthly report separates favorable mentions from the other kind.
You can't dictate it, but you can shape it — AI engines compose your narrative from the sources they trust, so changing the narrative means changing the sources. The loop: track how each engine currently describes you (including sentiment), find the pages feeding any wrong or stale claims, then place fresh coverage and corrections that outweigh them. Brands that run this loop consistently watch their descriptions shift within a few months.
Perplexity and ChatGPT now cite our comparison page when people ask about payroll software. That page had zero AI mentions before the campaign.
The share-of-voice tracking finally showed our board what AI visibility actually means. Three placements in, we passed two competitors.
Weekly reports across five AI engines, and the placements are real editorial pieces. Worth every credit.
Good mix of data and hands-on work. The competitor gap list gave us a clear, prioritised backlog instead of vague advice.
One report, every major engine, your top prompts, your RankCited Score. If the numbers look great, frame it. If they don't, pick a plan and we'll get to work.
Run my free report